Okay, it must be synchronicity that makes me blog this little topic but I had three people this week express similar reservations (or questions) to one another about what Twitter seemed appropriate, or inappropriate for. I guess that’s as good of a reason to bring it up here as any?
One person thought it odd to use Twitter at all, considering instant messaging was similar. Another comment suggested that the privacy of broadcasting to so many people was problematic. The most recent mention was about the understandably odd idea of using Twitter to organize groups of people (such as business travelers arriving for a conference) for things such as dinners, cab sharing, etc.
These are things I understand completely and can’t argue with because I had similar doubts or reservations before I began using Twitter.
Surprisingly, these are exactly the sort of things that catapulted Twitter to the level it’s currently at.
During the SxSW (South by Southwest) conferences Twitter users frequently (obsessively, actually) tweeted (publicly broadcasted) interesting or, in their opinion, uninteresting talks, seminars, and presentations and even the conference promoters cited huge, dynamic flows of attendees between events. I won’t go into the small but Tweetery group that caused a Twitter ruckus during one of the events.
Then, the craziness really began: the after-parties. It was awash with Tweets like “After party Bigelows @ 10th and Main with @soandso @soandso” – and people knew where to go and who was there all without a single phone call. Needless to say some of these things would require multiple phone calls (and perhaps long distance charges).
So, as bizarre as it might be, Twitter (especially in the SF Bay Area) has taken on a life of its own for these sorts of things.
I think some people also like to be a little geeky-voyeuristic and maybe participate vicariously through tweets.
It’s cool. Some people use Twitter as a mini-IM (not my favorite but I’m guilty of it too when my HD crashed and I lost my IM’s). Some use it as a random train-of-thought way of expressing short ideas. Others use it as a nonstop marketing machine (something I despise). However, I think that’s the first appeal of Twitter – the “use it as you like” element.
There’s also an element of instantaneous communication – but without the need to reply or have pre-existing relationships with the people involved. An instant messenger usually requires a person to send and have approved either an invite request or permission. This isn’t always reciprocated, either. Twitter allows anyone to follow the musings of another without permission – by default.
I follow people I have no prior relationship with and, realistically, probably never would have had it not been for Twitter. I could read their comments, respond back, and if they chose to ignore me… it was never a rejection. However, if they chose to respond… that opened a door in a controlled and measured way that private email or instant messaging makes difficult.
I wouldn’t ever broadcast something on Twitter I wouldn’t be willing to say in an office full of coworkers, of course. However, it’s not unusual to read things that are obviously intended for others (and therefor a little cryptic) but innocuous.
My general instinct is that Twitter will find its way but it works many ways for many people and it’s they who will determine its core usefulness – providing the company can either muster the tweeticles to deal with their internal issues (including scalability) or hire/sell off to a firm that can. This is a post for another day, though.
Thanks to Action Datsun for the wallpaper image.
When I had my PC bonkeroo last week it was a series of problems – one on top of the other. So, my intentions of going from PC to Mac (at least for my regular “daily” life) were simply hastened.
In particular, I’d like to invite you to not only join Twitter (if you’re not already on it) but to follow me (and likely my following you in return).